A Petition to Congress Jan 9 2016  B Jan 25 2015 Memorandum in Support of Petition 3. Notice to President of Rep. of Colombia Jan 3 2015 of Att Lien

The Hon. Rep. Bob Goodlatte, 2309 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515

Dear. Chairman Goodlatte,

I submit my petition to you as a member of Virginia’s Delegation to Congress and as Chairman of the House of Representative Judiciary Committee because it concerns the rights of all citizens of Virginia and to protect my property right in my Virginia Attorney’s Lien on Sea Search Armada’s (“SSA”) claim to treasure trove recently confirmed located by the Pres. of Colombia and valued at $18 Billion USD.[1]  Thus, I request an investigation and if warranted impeachment of the Hon U.S. Dist. Judge (E.D. VA) John A. Gibney, Jr., due to his systematic denial of access to a trial by jury of the evidence of malfeasance and business conspiracy by his summary dismissal and prior restraint enjoining my filing any future suit for damages, Isidoro Rodriguez, Esq., v. Jane/John Does of the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board, et al., U.S. Dist. Ct. E.D. VA 12‑cv‑663‑JAB).

I underscore that the petition is consistent with doctrine of separation of power by seeking enforcement of the U.S. constitutional limitation and prohibitions, as well as the Seventh Amendment’s ban on Judge Gibney’s power to deny access to an impartial trial by jury of the evidence of malfeasance and business conspiracy.  As Thomas Jefferson wrote in a letter to Thomas Paine in 1789: “I consider trial by jury as the only anchor ever yet imagined by men, by which the government can be held to the principles of its constitution.”  Furthermore, the petition is consistent with the Tenth Amendment’s mandate on you to assure the enforcement of the limitations and prohibition under VA Const. VI §§ 1, 5 & 7, VA Code §§ 54-1-3915 and 54-1-3935, and the Void Ab Initio Order Doctrine, because the petition seek redress:

  • For the usurping of legislative power by the surreptitious use of Supreme Court of Virginia rules to replace the decentralized attorney disciplinary system created under VA Code § 54-1-3935, with a centralized system under the court’s control by it establishing the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board (“VSBDB”) as a “kangaroo court,” and naming its members as “judges” (see https://t.co/sLv7pz3zD5); [2] and,
  • For the business conspiracy to deprive me of my business, profession, and property in violation VA Code §§ 18.2‑499 and 500, by the affirming of the VSBDB void ab initio order disbarring me for litigating to enforce my statutory rights (http://www.vsb.org/docs/Final_Order_Rodr_11-28-06.pdf): (i) in my choate VA Attorney’s Lien for fees owed for service as Legal Representative of SSA since 1988;[3] and, (ii) as a father under joint custody agreement and Treaty to protect my 13 year-old U.S. citizen son from being forced from Virginia to the “zone of war” in Colombia in 2002 (http://www.liamsdad.org/others/isidoro.shtml).[4]

I assert that the above acts of malfeasance and business conspiracy are motivated in retaliation for my serving U.S. and Virginia citizens for more than 30 years as an independent advocate capable and willing to challenge unlawful government actions and policies.[5]  In short, the use of the VSBD void ab initio order confirms that, “[t]here is no crueler tyranny than that which is exercised under cover of law, and with the colors of justice …”– U.S. vs. Jannottie, 673 F.2d 578, 614 (3d Cir. 1982). [6]  Seldom has there been such clear and extensive evidence of government attorneys and employees, including judges, conspiring to violate the mandate of separation of power under the limitations and prohibitions of the VA Const. and VA Code.[7]

Thus, action by Congress is mandated for as Thomas Jefferson observed more than 200 years ago, “[t]he germ of destruction of our nation is in the power of the judiciary, an irresponsible body – working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall render powerless the checks of one branch over the other and will become as venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated.”


Isidoro Rodríguez

[1] In Sea Search Armada vs. the Republic of Colombia,  the court wrote, Aprior opinion noted that the plaintiff can obtain no more than A$2 billion to $8.5 billion,….@ Sea Search Armada, 821 F. Supp. 2d at 275

[2] To hold VA government attorney and employees, including judges accountable for malfeasance a separate petition has been filed with each Member of the VA General Assembly (see http://www.isidororodriguez.com).

[3] Surreally, the Judge Gibney, Jr., held that there was no jurisdiction in Virginia over SSA, thereby assuming away the business conspiracy by SSA entering Virginia to file the fraudulent VSBDB complaint.

[4]Once able, my son returned to Virginia in 2007, to graduate from VA Tech, and now resides in Northern Virginia.

[5] The motive for the acts of malfeasance and business conspiracy against me by affirming the void ab initio order is not limited to financial interests in conflict with my property rights, but, too are in retaliation for my past successful litigation against unlawful government acts and policies, i.e. Gutierrez de Martinez v. Lamagno and Drug Enforcement Administration, 515 U.S. 417 (1995) (DOJ surreally argued that a DEA agent outside of the US was not negligent for causing a car accident while driving drunk and having sex); Organization JD Ltda. v. Assist U.S. Attorney Arthur P. Hui and DOJ, 2nd Cir. No. 93‑6019 and 96‑6145 (interception without a warrant of all fund transfers to Colombia for more than two months); Lopez v. First Union, 129 F3rd. 1186 (11th Cir. 1997) (Banks and DOJ liable for unlawful interception of wire communication and access to account information without a warrant); and Cooperative Multiactive de Empeados de Distribuidores de Drogas Coopservir Ltda. v. Newcomb, et al., D.C. Cir. No 99‑5190, S Ct. No 99‑1893 (DOJ=s issuance of unlawful bill of attainder under War Powers Act).

[6] “Crime is contagious. If the Government becomes a law breaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy,” Olmstad v. United States, 277 U.S. 438, 451 (1928). See RICO complaint against government attorneys and judge http://www.complaintsboard.com/complaints/sea-search-armada-annandale-virginia-c477026.html.

[7] Misprision of treason is defined pursuant to VA Code §§ 18.2‑481 and 482, as the, “[r]esisting the execution of the laws under color of authority,” which if proved, “, shall be punishable as a Class 2 felony.